Abstract
Words matter, especially in times of crisis. This article analyses the complexities of political discourse on vulnerability by considering the case of the Dutch COVID-19 response. Our study finds that the framing of vulnerability as a predetermined and naturalised condition, linked to old age and pre-existing medical conditions, draws attention away from aspects of precarisation tied to economic position, social class, cultural background and living conditions. This rhetorical strategy can be understood as a practice of de-responsibilisation through which attention is rhetorically diverted from the way(s) in which political authorities are implicated in producing, exacerbating or failing to mitigate vulnerabilities.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 365-383 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | International Journal of Care and Caring |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 7 Apr 2023 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 7 Apr 2023 |
Keywords
- COVID-19
- de-responsibilisation
- political discourse
- vulnerability
Themes from the UHS research agenda
- Democracy, citizenship and education
- Justice, diversity and inclusion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing words, balancing lives: Framing vulnerability in times of crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver