Can the prevailing description of educational reality be considered complete? On the Parks-Eichmann paradox, spooky action at a distance, and a missing dimension in the theory of education.

G. J. J. Biesta

doi:10.1177/1478210320910312

Can the prevailing description of educational reality be considered complete? On the Parks-Eichmann paradox, spooky action at a distance, and a missing dimension in the theory of education.

G. J. J. Biesta

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Original language	American English
Pages (from-to)	1011-1025
Number of pages	15
Journal	Policy Futures in Education (online)
Volume	18
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1478210320910312
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2020

Access to Document

10.1177/1478210320910312Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{18ac74226400490aae07ab86d1d501cb,

title = "Can the prevailing description of educational reality be considered complete? On the Parks-Eichmann paradox, spooky action at a distance, and a missing dimension in the theory of education.",

author = "Biesta, {G. J. J.}",

year = "2020",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/1478210320910312",

language = "American English",

volume = "18",

pages = "1011--1025",

journal = "Policy Futures in Education (online)",

issn = "1478-2103",

publisher = "Symposium Journals Ltd",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can the prevailing description of educational reality be considered complete? On the Parks-Eichmann paradox, spooky action at a distance, and a missing dimension in the theory of education.

AU - Biesta, G. J. J.

PY - 2020/1/1

Y1 - 2020/1/1

U2 - 10.1177/1478210320910312

DO - 10.1177/1478210320910312

M3 - Article

SN - 1478-2103

VL - 18

SP - 1011

EP - 1025

JO - Policy Futures in Education (online)

JF - Policy Futures in Education (online)

ER -