Abstract
This article showcases an extensive team-reflexivity process of an embarking transdisciplinary research team in psychiatry. It explores a multilayered tension between the authors, five Dutch researchers with different embodied positions, from diverse research traditions and at different stages of their careers. This article represents a meaningful collision between the rise of horizontalizing participatory research practices, and persistent traditional hierarchies in academic psychiatry. We show how this played out in a hierarchical, transdisciplinary research team, including its emotion work and power ambiguities. Such an intensive and shared reflexivity process is novel, that is, not typical of a responsive research design. The value of this article is that we show and analyze what we have come to call our ‘passible polyphony’: a thorough grappling with multiple perspectives in often disharmonious interactions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Qualitative Research |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2 Jul 2025 |
Keywords
- Collaboration
- Dialogue
- Language
- Polyphony
- Positionality
- Power
- Psychiatry
- Responsive
- Team-reflexivity
- Transdisciplinary
Themes from the UHS research agenda
- Democracy and citizenship
- Justice and inclusion
- Professional ethics and integrity