Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

D. Bierman; E. Lobach

Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

D. Bierman, E. Lobach

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Academic › peer-review

Abstract

This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures".(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.

Original language	American English
Number of pages	4
Journal	The Humanistic Psychologist
Volume	35
Issue number	3
Publication status	Published - 1 Jan 2007

Cite this

@article{e580647c279d45fbb4a16371062d37f2,

title = "Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures",

abstract = "This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures{"}.(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.",

author = "D. Bierman and E. Lobach",

year = "2007",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "American English",

volume = "35",

journal = "The Humanistic Psychologist",

issn = "0887-3267",

publisher = "Routledge",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

AU - Bierman, D.

AU - Lobach, E.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures".(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.

AB - This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures".(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.

UR - http://m0134.fmg.uva.nl/publications/2007/humanisticpsychology.pdf

M3 - Article

SN - 0887-3267

VL - 35

JO - The Humanistic Psychologist

JF - The Humanistic Psychologist

IS - 3

ER -

Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

Abstract

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this