Abstract
Using frame analyses, the authors explore how people confirm, question or deny victimization, or refrain from interpretation. A frame consists of a problem definition (acts), the diagnosis of causes (identifying actors), and moral judgments. Results confirm that the interaction between factors defines the interpretation of victimization. Similar acts (for instance the consumption of alcohol) are ascribed different meanings depending on the type of frame. The positioning of actors in a frame determines who or what is perceived responsible for the (moral) judgment.
Original language | Dutch |
---|---|
Journal | Tijdschrift voor Criminologie |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Published outside the University of Humanistic Studies | Yes |