Samenvatting
In this response to The Music of Theology (2024), I remark upon three dimensions of the way of thinking theology set out by the authors. Firstly, I question the relationship between freedom and unfreedom they attribute to the aesthetic experience - because the theme of power is underdeveloped, I argue that the risk of being bound by undefined forces is greater than they show. Secondly, I show that their conceptualisation of resonance is more encompassing and ultimately convincing than Rosa's, because of the way they relate silence to sound. Finally, I show that the experience of music they operate under is private; focussing on the experience of live music might give a more thorough, relational understanding of music's foundational sharing.
| Originele taal-2 | Engels |
|---|---|
| Status | Gepubliceerd - 5 sep. 2024 |
| Evenement | The Irreplicable Human/-ities? International Society for Religion, Literature and Culture - Aarhus University, Skorpingen, Denemarken Duur: 5 sep. 2024 → 8 sep. 2024 |
Congres
| Congres | The Irreplicable Human/-ities? International Society for Religion, Literature and Culture |
|---|---|
| Land/Regio | Denemarken |
| Stad | Skorpingen |
| Periode | 5/09/24 → 8/09/24 |
Vingerafdruk
Duik in de onderzoeksthema's van 'Remarks on The Music of Theology'. Samen vormen ze een unieke vingerafdruk.Citeer dit
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver