Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

D. Bierman; E. Lobach

Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

D. Bierman
, E. Lobach

Onderzoeksoutput: Bijdrage aan tijdschrift › Artikel › Academic › peer review

Samenvatting

This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures".(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.

Originele taal-2	Amerikaans engels
Aantal pagina's	4
Tijdschrift	The Humanistic Psychologist
Volume	35
Nummer van het tijdschrift	3
Status	Gepubliceerd - 1 jan. 2007

Andere bestanden en links

Link to Publication

Citeer dit

@article{e580647c279d45fbb4a16371062d37f2,

title = "Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures",

abstract = "This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures{"}.(Delgado-Romero \& Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.",

author = "D. Bierman and E. Lobach",

year = "2007",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "Amerikaans engels",

volume = "35",

journal = "The Humanistic Psychologist",

issn = "0887-3267",

publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

AU - Bierman, D.

AU - Lobach, E.

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures".(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.

AB - This is a discussion of the article ''Finding and correcting flawed research literatures".(Delgado-Romero & Howard, 2005). A number of weaknesses in the evaluation method that was proposed are pointed out and an improved more quantitative evaluation method based upon Bayesian statistics is proposed.

UR - http://m0134.fmg.uva.nl/publications/2007/humanisticpsychology.pdf

M3 - Artikel

SN - 0887-3267

VL - 35

JO - The Humanistic Psychologist

JF - The Humanistic Psychologist

IS - 3

ER -

Toward More Explicit Means of Assessing Controversial Research Literatures

Samenvatting

Andere bestanden en links

Vingerafdruk

Citeer dit